Carbonxide M1 Dense and Insulating Alumina based castables Results in Lab & Practice Results on alumina based dense castable Comparison with and without additive- Influence of 1% Carbonxide M1 Table 1: New Additive M1 (IT) – (2019) – Porosity: 20,27% – HMOR: 34,48 N/mm2Table 2: Additive M1 (CH) – (2018) – Porosity: 17,03% – HMOR:21,97 N/mm2 Table 3: Standard cartable without Additive – Porosity: 15,36% – HMOR: 17,64 N/mm2 Results on alumina based dense castable Influence of 1% Carbonxide M1 Refractoriness under Load (RUL) with and without Carbonxide M1 Creep under Compression with and without Carbonxide M1 Summary of Lab Tests from Dense castable Comparison with and without additive M1 1. Comparable results with the Additive M1– Bulk Density -Cold Crushing Strength (CCS)2. Improved results with the Additive M1– Apparent Porosity– Thermal conductivity– Young’s modulus of rupture– HMOR– Refractoriness under Load (RuL)– Creep under Compression (CuC)– Thermal Diffusivity– Specific heat capacity Results on alumina based insulating castable Influence of 1% Carbonxide M1 Summary of Lab Tests from Insulating castable Comparison with and without additive M1 1. Comparable results with the Additive M1 Bulk DensityApparent Porosity CCS2.Improved results with the Additive M1Thermal conductivityYoung’s modulus of ruptureHMORSpecific heat capacityThermal diffusivityHT-Resonant frequent damping analysis (RFDA) ICR - International Colloquium on Refractories Refractories Worldforum